-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
feat: support realtime toggle update via socket.io #29
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #29 +/- ##
============================================
- Coverage 76.74% 75.77% -0.98%
- Complexity 268 271 +3
============================================
Files 31 31
Lines 972 1003 +31
Branches 68 70 +2
============================================
+ Hits 746 760 +14
- Misses 184 200 +16
- Partials 42 43 +1
|
|
Good Job, How about add a Test case to connecting |
|
it was manually tested, imho it’s not a good idea to let ut depends on external resourcesBest regards,Zean HeSent from mobile device.On Dec 28, 2022, at 10:49, SSebo ***@***.***> wrote:
Good Job, How about add a Test case to connecting featureprobe.io to make sure socketio connect success?
—Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
You are right, but it is better than no test. Rust SDK test this via an embed Server.
|
|
Good, The stream feature should be independent. You can try to abstract a StreamSynchronizer to implement it. |
|
This request has been merged into #36 |
resolves #27